Managing up Executive Communication ~Part 7
- Priya Venkatesan
- 12 minutes ago
- 3 min read

This is Part 7 of the Executive Communication Series. Check out Part 1 , Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5 & Part 6 for the complete framework.

c) Executive Communication Archetypes (Extended on DISC)
Let's explore further combinations/hybrid.
Operator + Conductor [The collaborative Executor]

Why this combination works: The combination works because of "execution focus" —one through task completion and measurable results, the other through team dynamics and stakeholder collaboration.
The communication challenge: Tussle between Task Vs People.
Here are a few tips to communicate well with this combination
Play to shared values of task and people. Demonstrate accountability while honouring collaboration
Complement potential blind spots
Both may undervalue long-term strategic thinking. Be the anchor of the big picture.
Both may move quickly without sufficient data analysis—you bring evidence and frameworks to support their action bias.
Example: "We need to deliver the product refresh by March 15 to hit the market window [Big picture + Operator deadline]. I've worked with Product, Engineering, and Marketing to build a plan that doesn't overload any single team [Conductor collaboration]. Here's the timeline with clear owners [Operator accountability], and here's how we've distributed the work based on current team capacity [Conductor team health]. Weekly check-ins will track both delivery milestones and team wellbeing..."
Moving on to the [in]famous conflicting styles:
Analyst+Conductor [Data-People Stand-off]

Why this creates conflict: The conflict arises from fundamentally different priorities—one values logic, frameworks, and evidence-based decisions (Task + Thinking), the other values relationships, stakeholder alignment, and organizational health (People + Doing).
The communication challenge: Decision making based on Data Vs people, analysis Vs execution.
Here are a few tips to communicate well with this combination
Bridge the divide:
Bring in the contrast, acknowledge it explicitly.
Use data to support people decisions—show engagement scores, retention metrics, productivity data that validates the human element
Build stakeholder input into your analytical process
Example: "Our market analysis shows we need to exit the APAC region by Q2 to preserve capital [Analyst data]. I've met with all affected teams and regional leads—here are their concerns and the support plan we've co-created to manage this transition with dignity [Conductor people focus]. Here's how we balance financial necessity with our responsibility to our people..."
Visionary+Operator: [Dream-Execution Standoff]

Why this creates conflict: The conflict arises from fundamentally different time horizons and priorities—one focuses on transformational possibilities and bold futures (People + Thinking), the other focuses on tangible progress and immediate execution (Task + Doing). One lives in what could be; the other lives in what is.
The communication challenge: Vision and inspiration Vs concrete progress and action, transformation Vs delivery.
Here are a few tips to communicate well with this combination:
Create a bridge between vision and execution:
Start with inspiring future, then immediately show concrete actions
Translate vision into concrete outcomes—don't just say "transform customer experience," say "reduce customer effort score from 65 to 45 in 6 months".
Use a phased roadmap—show the transformational vision as North Star, then break it into achievable milestones with clear owners and timelines.
Demonstrate momentum—show both the audacious goal AND what you've already accomplished
Example: "What if we could become the most trusted brand in our category—where customers choose us not on price, but on values alignment? [Visionary transformation]. We've already started—we've redesigned our customer onboarding, trained 150 frontline staff, and saw NPS increase 12 points in our pilot market [Operator tangible progress]. Here's the 12-month roadmap that takes us from pilot to full transformation, with quarterly check points...."
How did you like the Executive communication archetypes?
How do you adapt to different archetypes?



Comments